[Event "Acropolis Open"]
[Site "Athens GRE"]
[Date "2007.08.14"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Parginos, V."]
[Black "Grivas, E."]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A80"]
[WhiteElo "2226"]
[BlackElo "2507"]
[Annotator "Neil McDonald"]
[PlyCount "38"]
[EventDate "2007.08.14"]
[Source "Mark Crowther"]
[SourceDate "2007.08.27"]

1. d4 {This game refers to Chapter One: 'Gambit Lines and Early Oddities'.
There isn't much for Black to fear here as long as the pieces come out at a
regular rate.} f5 2. h3 {We should expand our analysis a little as GM Simon
Williams has played 4.Nf3!? with success.} ({A quick word on the Staunton
Gambit. After} 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Nc6 5. d5 Ne5 6. Qe2 Nf7 7. Bxf6
exf6 8. Nxe4 {strong players of Black are still putting the bishop on e7 or b4
and getting a poor game, when I believe that 8...Qe7 is the best move - see
page 32 of the book. For example} Bb4+ $6 (8... Qe7 $1 {and if} 9. d6 Qe6) ({
whereas} 8... Be7 $6 9. d6 $1 {is bad for Black}) 9. c3 Be7 10. d6 cxd6 11. Qd2
Qc7 12. Ne2 d5 13. Qxd5 O-O 14. Nd4 {Black never quite gets enough dynamism to
offset the holes in his centre.} g6 15. Nb5 Qb6 16. O-O-O Kg7 17. Bc4 d6 18.
Rhe1 Ne5 19. Bb3 Bd7 20. Nd4 f5 21. f4 fxe4 22. fxe5 e3 23. Kb1 Bf5+ 24. Ka1 a5
25. exd6 Bf6 26. Nxf5+ gxf5 27. Qxf5 Kh8 28. Bc2 Rf7 29. Qe6 Raf8 30. Rxe3 Qc5
31. Rh3 b5 32. Qe4 {1-0 I.Ivanisevic-S.Drazic, Kragujevac 2011.}) 2... d5 ({
The move order to reach page 18 in the book is} 2... Nf6 3. g4 d5) 3. g4 Nf6 ({
Versus IM Simon Ansell I played the rather greedy} 3... fxg4 4. hxg4 Bxg4 {
mainly because I was afraid my opponent had read my Dutch book and prepared a
line against 3...Nf6.} 5. Qd3 Nf6 6. Bh3 Qd7 ({Here} 6... Bxh3 $2 7. Nxh3 {
would do White's work for him by developing his knight.}) 7. Bxg4 Qxg4 8. Nf3 (
{Missing his chance for} 8. Qb5+ {when if} Nc6 $6 ({instead} 8... Nbd7 9. Qxb7
{looks perhaps a bit better for White}) 9. Qxb7 Kd7 10. Nf3 $1 {might have
been awkward for Black.} ({I had planned} 10. Qxa8 Qg2 {which is good for
Black, but missed the simple developing move 10.Nf3. Fortunately so did my
opponent.})) 8... Nc6 9. Nc3 O-O-O 10. Rh4 Qd7 11. Bg5 g6 12. O-O-O Bg7 13.
Rdh1 Ng4 14. Nd1 h6 15. Rg1 Nxf2 16. Nxf2 hxg5 17. Rxh8 Rxh8 18. c3 e5 19. dxe5
Nxe5 20. Nxe5 Bxe5 21. Qxg6 Bf4+ 22. Kb1 Be3 23. Rh1 Rxh1+ 24. Nxh1 c6 25. Ng3
d4 26. Nf5 d3 27. Nd6+ Kc7 28. Qxd3 Qxd6 29. Qxe3 Qd1+ 30. Qc1 Qxc1+ 31. Kxc1
Kd6 32. Kd2 Ke5 33. Ke3 g4 34. a4 a5 35. Kf2 Kf4 36. Kg2 c5 37. Kf2 c4 38. Kg2
Ke3 39. Kg3 Kxe2 40. Kxg4 Kd3 {0-1 S.Ansell-N.McDonald, Hinckley Island 2010.})
4. Nf3 Nc6 $1 {Solid development. Unlike your author, Grivas is a wily Greek
GM who is too experienced to fall for the charms of pawn grabbing.} ({Instead} 
4... fxg4 5. hxg4 Bxg4 6. Ne5 Bf5 7. Bh3 e6 ({Even here} 7... Qc8 $5 {might be
OK for Black.}) 8. Bxf5 exf5 9. Qd3 Nc6 10. Bg5 Qd6 11. Nc3 Nxe5 12. dxe5 Qxe5
13. Bxf6 gxf6 14. Qb5+ Kf7 15. O-O-O $1 {and Williams had built up his attack
in admirable style.} d4 16. Qc4+ Qe6 17. Qxc7+ Be7 18. Rxd4 Qc6 19. Qh2 h5 20.
Rhd1 Rac8 21. Kb1 b5 22. R1d2 Kg6 23. Nd5 Bc5 24. Nf4+ Kf7 25. Rd7+ Ke8 26.
Nxh5 Rg8 27. R2d6 {1-0 S.Williams-M.Goodger, Hastings 2010.}) 5. Nc3 e6 6. Rg1
Ne4 $1 {A classic example of responding to an attempt to attack on the wing
with a counterattack in the centre.} 7. gxf5 exf5 8. Ng5 ({This attempt to
attack quickly leads to disaster, but} 8. Bf4 Bb4 9. Qd3 Qe7 {etc. was also
pretty unpleasant for White.}) 8... Nxc3 9. bxc3 Be7 10. e4 {The type of move
that either gets an exclamation mark or two or leads to self destruction.} fxe4
({Certainly not} 10... dxe4 $2 11. Bc4) 11. Qh5+ g6 12. Qh6 Bf8 13. Qh4 h6 14.
Be2 Bg7 15. Bh5 Bf5 $1 {Another ultra-calm developing move that brushes off
White's attempt to confuse matters.} 16. Qf4 Qd7 17. Nf3 exf3 18. Rxg6 Bxg6 19.
Bxg6+ Kd8 0-1

[Event "12th ch-EUR"]
[Site "Aix-les-Bains FRA"]
[Date "2011.03.30"]
[Round "8.61"]
[White "Stern, R."]
[Black "Bartel, Mat"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A80"]
[WhiteElo "2497"]
[BlackElo "2638"]
[Annotator "Neil McDonald"]
[PlyCount "104"]
[EventDate "2011.03.22"]
[Source "Mark Crowther"]
[SourceDate "2007.08.27"]

{This game refers to Chapter Two, 'White plays 2 Nc3'.} 1. d4 f5 2. Nc3 d5 3.
Bf4 ({After} 3. Bg5 {, given on page 49,} h6 4. Bf4 Nf6 5. e3 g5 6. Be5 e6 7.
h4 $5 {has been suggested as a strong riposte by White (rather than 7.Nb5) but
I think Black is OK after} g4 {, for example} 8. Nge2 ({or} 8. f3 Nbd7 9. Bf4
a6 {- a precaution against Nb5 -} 10. Be2 h5 {and Black remains firm on the
light squares}) 8... Nc6 9. Nf4 Rg8 10. Bb5 Bb4 {with unclear play.}) 3... a6
$1 {I still like this little move, and more importantly so does Bartel!} 4. e3
({Or} 4. f3 Nf6 5. e4 fxe4 6. fxe4 dxe4 7. Bc4 {Here on page 41 I recommend 7..
.Nc6! and there's no reason to change it. But I can't resist showing you a
nice win by a 2700 Elo player as Black in the Dutch. It's the sort of attack
we suffer all the misery of 1...f5 to have the chance of occasionally carrying
out:} Bf5 $5 8. Nge2 e6 9. Be5 Nc6 10. Nf4 Qe7 11. Bxf6 Qxf6 12. Bxe6 {With
his initiative faltering, White tries to force his way through with a
combination. But why should this work? Black isn't behind in development.} Bxe6
13. Nxe6 Qxe6 14. d5 Qh6 15. dxc6 Bd6 $1 {An excellent move, just ignoring the
c6-pawn.} 16. cxb7 $2 ({in any case after say} 16. Qg4 O-O {White's king is
going to come under attack}) 16... Bg3+ $1 {0-1 J.Czakon-R.Wojtaszek, Wroclaw
2011. It gets too embarrassing for the white king after} 17. Ke2 ({prosaic is} 
17. hxg3 Qxh1+) 17... Qh5+ 18. Ke3 Qg5+ 19. Ke2 Qg4+ 20. Ke3 ({or} 20. Kf1 O-O+
) 20... Qf4+ 21. Kd4 (21. Ke2 Qf2#) 21... Qf6+ 22. Kc4 Qc6+ 23. Kb3 Qxb7+ 24.
Ka4 Qc6+ 25. Ka5 Rb8 {with a mate looming.}) ({Returning to the opening,
remember that if White adopts the move order} 4. e4 {you have to take on e4
with} dxe4 {and now} ({as if} 4... fxe4 $2 {then} 5. Qh5+ g6 6. Qxd5 {is
terrible for Black}) 5. f3 Nf6 6. fxe4 fxe4 {transposes to the Czakon game.})
4... Nf6 5. Bd3 {It becomes clear next move that White intends to solidify his
centre and start an attack on the kingside. In fact I believe his best chance
for advantage is through action on the c-file with an eventual d4xc5 [after
Black's ...c7-c5] and c2-c4.} ({A key line runs} 5. Nf3 e6 6. Bd3 c5 7. dxc5 ({
Some time after the book was published I suddenly became scared of the
possibility of} 7. Ne5 Nbd7 8. O-O Nxe5 9. dxe5 ({instead} 9. Bxe5 Bd6 {looks
OK for Black}) 9... Nd7 ({rather grotty for Black is} 9... Ne4 10. Bxe4 dxe4
11. Qe2 {as his centre is static and can be undermined with a future f2-f3 or
g2-g4}) 10. g4 $5 {However, when I asked Rybka it just metaphorically shrugged
its shoulders and played} Nb6 $1 {when f5 is defended and in time Black can
get counterplay with ...d5-d4.}) 7... Bxc5 8. O-O O-O 9. Ne2 Nc6 10. c4 ({
White can prevent Black's next move with} 10. a3 {and prepare the pawn advance
b4-b5, but it looks harmless:} Qe7 11. b4 Ba7 12. b5 axb5 13. Bxb5 e5 {Having
safely achieved this pawn advance Black is surely better.} 14. Bg3 Bb8 15. c4
dxc4 16. Bxc4+ Kh8 17. Bb5 Ne4 18. Qc1 Bd7 19. Rd1 Bd6 $2 ({Black has the two
bishops and more space after} 19... Nxg3 {- he must have underestimated
White's next move}) 20. Bh4 $1 Qe8 21. Ng5 Nxg5 22. Bxg5 Bb8 23. Qc5 $1 {and
despite the precarious-looking bishop on g5 White was on top in K.Grigoryan-E.
Kozganbayev, Moscow 2011.}) 10... Nb4 $5 {On page 44 I say that Glenn Flear
recommends this move on Chesspublishing.com. Now we have an illustrative game
to test it and, yep, it looks good for equality:} 11. a3 Nxd3 12. Qxd3 Bd7 13.
Ne5 Bd6 $1 {Notice how Black attacks the knight on e5 that defends c4 and then
plays ...Rc8 to cajole White into an exchange on d7, when the final developing
move ...Rfd8 becomes possible.} 14. Rfd1 Rc8 15. Nxd7 Qxd7 16. Rac1 Rfd8 17.
Bxd6 Qxd6 18. h3 Qb6 19. Nd4 $5 Qxb2 $2 ({Playing with fire, though White soon
blunders back.} 19... Rxc4 20. Rxc4 dxc4 21. Qxc4 Qd6 {exploiting the pin
along the d-file is equal after say} 22. Rc1 Nd5) 20. c5 e5 21. Rc2 e4 22. Qf1
$2 ({Black would have a very difficult endgame after} 22. Rxb2 exd3 23. Rxb7 {
as of course if} Rxc5 24. Ne6 {wins}) 22... Qxa3 23. Ra1 Qd3 24. Qe1 a5 25.
Qxa5 f4 26. Qe1 fxe3 27. fxe3 Ra8 28. Rb1 Rd7 29. Rcb2 Qa3 30. Rb5 h6 31. Nf5
Kh7 32. Qg3 Qc3 33. R5b3 Qxc5 34. Rxb7 Ra7 35. Rb8 Qc7 36. Qe1 Qe5 37. Nd4 Ra2
38. R8b2 Rxb2 39. Rxb2 Ra7 40. Qf1 Qg5 41. Qf4 Qxf4 42. exf4 Ra1+ 43. Kf2 Ra4
44. Ne6 e3+ 45. Ke2 Re4 46. f5 Nh5 47. Kd3 Ng3 48. Nd4 Re5 49. Rb1 Ne4 50. Re1
Nc5+ 51. Ke2 Re4 52. Rc1 Na4 53. Ne6 Rc4 54. Rxc4 dxc4 55. Kxe3 Kg8 56. Nf4 Kf7
{1/2-1/2 D.Svetushkin-V.Sivuk, St Petersburg 2010.}) 5... e6 6. Nce2 ({There
was still the chance for} 6. Nf3 {reaching more aggressive lines discussed
above and in the book.}) 6... c5 7. c3 c4 {Now Black has no more worries about
his centre being broken up by d4xc5 and c3-c4.} 8. Bc2 Nc6 9. h3 h6 $1 {Bartel
shows his profound understanding of the Dutch Defence. He isn't going to sit
back and let White prepare an attack on the kingside. On the contrary, he
mobilizes his pawns to seize space on that wing as well.} 10. Nf3 g5 11. Bh2
Bd6 12. Bxd6 Qxd6 13. h4 Rg8 14. b4 Bd7 15. a4 Ke7 $1 {The king is safest in
the centre. Therefore rather than castling he steps forward one square to
allow the rook on a8 to join in the kingside action.} 16. Ng3 Raf8 17. hxg5
hxg5 18. b5 axb5 19. axb5 Nd8 20. Ra7 {At first glance things might seem
bright for White: Stern has two rooks on open files and is ready to seize the
e5 square with 21. Ne5, when 21...Nf7 is impossible as b7 would drop. However,
the black pieces are tightly co-ordinated and ready to launch a counterattack.}
Ng4 {Not only guarding e5 but also aiming at the rather fragile looking White
kingside pawns.} 21. Rh7+ Rf7 22. Rxf7+ Kxf7 23. Ke2 Qb8 24. Ra1 Ke7 25. b6 Nf7
26. Ra7 Nxe3 $1 {The black counterattack begins.} 27. Kxe3 f4+ 28. Ke2 fxg3 29.
Qc1 gxf2 30. Kxf2 Bc8 31. Qe3 Qd6 32. Ra1 Qxb6 33. Rh1 Qb2 34. Qd2 g4 35. Ne5
Nxe5 36. Rh7+ Kd8 37. dxe5 g3+ 38. Ke2 b5 39. Kd1 Qa1+ 40. Ke2 Qg1 41. Qf4
Qxg2+ 42. Ke1 Qf2+ 43. Qxf2 gxf2+ 44. Kxf2 Rg5 45. Ke3 Rxe5+ 46. Kd4 Re2 47.
Bg6 Rg2 48. Bh5 Rg5 49. Kc5 d4+ 50. Kxd4 Rd5+ 51. Ke4 b4 52. cxb4 c3 0-1

[Event "Rilton Cup 2010-11"]
[Site "Stockholm SWE"]
[Date "2010.12.30"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Lindberg, Bo"]
[Black "Ostling, H."]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A80"]
[WhiteElo "2404"]
[BlackElo "2207"]
[Annotator "Neil McDonald"]
[PlyCount "39"]
[EventDate "2010.12.27"]
[Source "Mark Crowther"]
[SourceDate "2007.08.27"]

{This game refers to Chapter Three: 'White plays 2 Bg5'.} 1. d4 f5 2. Bg5 h6 3.
Bh4 g5 4. e4 {As the examples show, Black has to tread carefully in this
variation.} Nf6 5. e5 e6 6. Bg3 f4 7. Bxf4 ({After} 7. Bd3 $5 d5 $5 {might be
the best reply. It makes a hole on d7 for the king and besides the advance ...
d7-d5 is a typical part of Black's opening set up in this line.} 8. exf6 Qxf6
9. Qh5+ Kd8 10. Nf3 Nc6 11. c3 Bd7 $5 ({Also possible was} 11... Bd6 $5 12. O-O
({if} 12. h4 g4 $1 {looks a good reply as} 13. Qxg4 e5 {is painful for White})
12... Bd7 {etc.}) ({Notice that Black doesn't hurry to retake on g3 - the
white bishop won't run away, so why open lines for White's rook on h1 with} 
11... fxg3 12. hxg3 {?}) 12. h4 fxg3 $6 ({Black still had the chance for} 12...
g4 $5 {when an amusing variation is} 13. Ne5 Nxe5 14. dxe5 Qg7 15. Bh2 Be8 {
and the white queen is boxed in}) 13. hxg5 gxf2+ 14. Kxf2 Qe7 15. Nbd2 Bg7 16.
Rae1 {Hoang has managed to coordinate her pieces, but the game would still be
pretty unclear if Black hadn't allowed a queen sacrifice.} hxg5 17. Qxh8+ Bxh8
18. Rxh8+ Be8 19. Bg6 ({here} 19. Reh1 $1 {followed by 20.Bg6 or 20.R1h7 as
required would leave Black defenceless}) 19... Kd7 20. Bf5 Nd8 21. Rh7 Bf7 22.
Ne5+ Kc8 23. Nxf7 Qf6 24. g4 exf5 25. Re8 fxg4+ 26. Kg2 b6 27. Nxd8 Qg6 28.
Rhe7 Qc2 29. Ne6+ Kb7 30. Rxc7+ Ka6 31. Nc5+ {1-0 Hoang Thanh Trang-R.Bellin,
Budapest 2005.}) 7... gxf4 8. Nh3 $6 {Not a particularly good move but in this
game its surprise value proves decisive.} Nd5 $2 ({Black should develop with} 
8... Bg7 {e.g.} 9. exf6 ({or} 9. Nxf4 O-O $1 10. exf6 Qxf6 {and Black takes
the initiative as both f4 and d4 are hanging}) 9... Qxf6 10. Qh5+ Kd8 {with a
position typical of games in this line but with the white knight offside on h3.
}) 9. Qh5+ Ke7 10. c4 Nb4 11. Qg6 $1 {Not only stopping a check on c2 but also
paralysing the black kingside as 11...Bg7 is prevented and 11...Qe8 allows
mate in one.} d5 12. Nxf4 Qe8 13. a3 $1 {Lindberg drives back the knight after
which d5 crumbles.} N4c6 14. Qf6+ Kd7 15. cxd5 Nxd4 16. dxe6+ Nxe6 17. Nc3 Nxf4
18. O-O-O+ Bd6 19. Rxd6+ cxd6 20. Qxd6# 1-0

[Event "London Chess Classic FIDE Open"]
[Site "London ENG"]
[Date "2010.12.13"]
[Round "7"]
[White "Hennigan, M."]
[Black "McDonald, N."]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A10"]
[WhiteElo "2388"]
[BlackElo "2449"]
[Annotator "Neil McDonald"]
[PlyCount "52"]
[EventDate "2010.12.08"]
[Source "Mark Crowther"]
[SourceDate "2007.08.27"]

{This game refers to Chapter Eight: 'The Dutch versus 1 Nf3 and 1 c4'.} 1. g3 (
{Mention should also be made of the Lisitsyn Gambit} 1. Nf3 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3.
Ng5 e5 4. d3 e3 5. Bxe3 Nc6 6. c4 $5 ({Pretty harmless is} 6. Be2 {when Black
can equalize with sensible play:} Be7 7. Nf3 ({Black also looks fine after} 7.
h4 Nf6 8. Bh5+ g6 9. Bf3 h6 10. Ne4 d5 11. Nxf6+ Bxf6 {as in G.Schott-K.Schulz,
Troisdorf 2005}) 7... Nf6 8. O-O O-O 9. d4 exd4 10. Nxd4 Nxd4 11. Bxd4 d5 {
Already things look good for Black with his extra pawn in the centre.} 12. c4
c5 $1 13. Be5 ({of course White can't play} 13. Bxf6 Bxf6 14. cxd5 $2 Bxb2)
13... d4 14. Nd2 Bf5 15. Bf3 Bd6 $1 {not being bullied into defending the b7
pawn with the queen.} 16. Re1 ({Bad for White is} 16. Bxd6 Qxd6 17. Bxb7 Rab8
18. Bf3 Rxb2) 16... Rb8 17. Qa4 a6 {Black has a good game thanks to his
protected passed pawn and kingside initiative, but GM Nikolic manages to hold
on.} 18. a3 Ng4 19. Bg3 Bxg3 20. hxg3 d3 21. Rf1 Qg5 22. Rad1 Rbe8 23. Qa5 Qh5
24. Bxg4 Bxg4 25. f3 Qe5 26. fxg4 Qe3+ 27. Kh2 Qh6+ 28. Kg1 Qe3+ {1/2-1/2 P.
Nikolic-E.Wiersma, Netherlands 2009.}) ({The alternative} 6. g3 {is given in
the book.}) 6... Nf6 7. Nc3 Bb4 ({pinning the white knight is the most natural
and popular idea, though} 7... Be7 $5 {also looks pretty decent for Black}) 8.
Nge4 O-O 9. Be2 Nd4 {It's interesting to follow IM Thomas Rendle's opening
preparation, as he might well have anticipated that GM Williams would try this
variation against him.} 10. O-O Bxc3 11. bxc3 Nxe2+ 12. Qxe2 Nxe4 13. dxe4 Qh4
$2 {So far so good for Black, but this is a doubtful excursion by the queen.} (
{Better is} 13... b6 $1 {with the positional threat of 14. ..d6 when White
would be left with crippled c-pawns. For example} 14. c5 bxc5 15. Qc4+ ({or
equally} 15. Bxc5 d6) 15... Kh8 16. Qxc5 d6 {and Black has avoided having his
d6-pawn compromised.}) 14. f3 b6 15. c5 Bb7 16. cxb6 cxb6 ({unfortunately for
Black} 16... axb6 17. Qc4+ {drops the c7-pawn}) 17. Rfd1 Bc6 18. a4 Qe7 19. a5
Rab8 20. axb6 axb6 21. Qf2 Qe6 22. Qd2 b5 23. Bc5 Rf6 24. Bd6 Re8 25. Qe3 h6
26. Rd2 Kh7 27. Rad1 Qc4 28. Bb4 Ra8 29. Bd6 Re6 30. Qc5 Qxc5+ 31. Bxc5 Ra4 32.
Rd6 Re8 33. h4 h5 34. R6d2 Rea8 35. Bd6 Re8 36. Kf2 Kg6 37. Ke3 Kf6 38. Bb4 Ra7
39. Rg1 Kf7 40. g4 hxg4 41. Rxg4 d5 42. exd5 Bd7 43. Rg5 Kf6 44. d6 g6 45. Rdg2
Bf5 46. h5 e4 47. f4 Rh7 48. hxg6 Rh3+ 49. R5g3 Rxg3+ 50. Rxg3 Rg8 51. Kd4 Rxg6
52. Re3 Rg8 53. Ba5 Rg1 54. Kc5 Rd1 55. Bb4 Ke6 56. Kxb5 Kd5 57. c4+ Ke6 58. c5
Rd3 59. Rxd3 exd3 60. Kc6 {S.Williams-T.Rendle, Canterbury 2010.}) 1... f5 2.
Bg2 Nf6 3. c4 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. d3 d6 6. e4 {The Botvinnik System. The
illustrative game in the book lasted 114 moves; this one is much shorter.} O-O
7. Nge2 fxe4 8. dxe4 c5 9. O-O Nc6 10. h3 e5 11. f4 Be6 12. Nd5 {An aggressive
move which combined with a later Bg5 might cause problems for Black.} ({In the
book we consider the more solid} 12. b3 {here.}) 12... Qd7 13. Kh2 ({I was
hoping to catch my opponent in something like} 13. g4 exf4 {(under no
circumstances should White be allowed to play 14.f5 in this type of set-up)}
14. Bxf4 ({Black looks at least comfortable after} 14. Nexf4 Bf7 $5) 14... Ne5
$1 (14... Rae8 $2 {proves a howler after} 15. Bxd6 $1) 15. Bg5 $2 {
Surprisingly enough this obvious move turns out to be a bad mistake.} Nxd5 16.
cxd5 Rxf1+ 17. Qxf1 Bxg4 $1 18. hxg4 Rf8 19. Bf4 {Moving the queen allows ...
Qxg4 threatening both ...g5 and ...Nf3+.} Qxg4 {and White has no good way to
meet 20...g5.}) 13... Rae8 14. Nec3 exf4 15. gxf4 Nd4 {Here Black looks fine.
It seems to me that 12.Nd5 isn't very promising because, as we have seen, it
doesn't combine well with the 13.g4 move. The pawn structure White adopts
gives Black a very simple plan - build up against the e4- and f4-pawns.} 16.
Be3 Nh5 17. Qd2 Rf7 18. Rab1 Ref8 19. b4 b6 20. bxc5 bxc5 21. Rf2 Qd8 {The
black queen heads towards h4 when the pressure on the white kingside proves
lethal.} 22. Rbf1 Qh4 23. Nb5 Bxh3 24. Rh1 ({Of course if} 24. Bxh3 Qg3+ 25.
Kh1 Qxh3+ {wins for Black.}) 24... Bxg2+ 25. Kxg2 Qg4+ 26. Kf1 Ng3+ 0-1

